Private Companies Misleading the Public, the Courts, and the Police
Debt Collectors and agents are private companies and cannot enter private homes with a locksmith to recover unlawful ‘debts’ including Council Tax, PCNs, or Unpaid Energy Bills.
The Data Protection Act 2018, requires all corporations registered with Companies House to be responsible for managing your data correctly. By applying for fraudulent warrants or passing your data onto a third party, they are misusing your data and breaking their role as a fiduciary. They are supposed to be in a position of responsibility, trusted to hold your data responsibly.
Inform the courts that the warrants are fraudulent and are made with the misuse of data. Make a complaint about the company applying for fraudulent warrants by not supplying a contract or actual meter readings, only estimates.
đź’Ą Complain To HMCTS https://hmcts-complaint-form-eng.form.service.justice.gov.uk/
đź’Ą Complain directly to the Court issuing the Warrant Find Here https://www.find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk/search-by-name
- The warrant says: Agent Not Employee, breach of Gas Act 1954
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/2-3/21/section/2 - Let the court know they are not a Network Operator, breach of Gas Act 1954
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/2-3/21/section/2 - Let the court know they are not a Supplier pursuant to the Electricity Act 1989
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/6 - The Court can Check companies house to verify – give them the URL and a screenshot of the SIC code for that Company.
- They have no Contract or Deed of Assignment.
- Breaching the Data Protection Act 2018 failing Fiduciary Duties; make an ICO Complaint https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/
- Breaches of the Fraud Act 2006 section 2. Fraud by false representation.
- Breaches of the Fraud Act 2006 section 3. Fraud by failing to disclose information.
- Breaches of the Fraud Act 2006 section 4. Fraud by abuse of position.
- Breaches of the Fraud Act 2006 section 7. Making or Supplying Articles for use in fraud.
Fraud Act 2006, Section 3, Fraud by failing to disclose information
A person is in breach of this section if he –
(a) dishonestly fails to disclose to another person information which he is under a legal duty to disclose, and
(b) intends, by failing to disclose the information –
(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
Fraud Act 2006, Section 4, Fraud by abuse of position.
(1) A person is in breach of this section if he-
(a) occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests
of another person,
(b) dishonestly abuses that position, and
(c) intends, by means of the abuse of that position-
(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
(2) A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.
Fraud Act 2006, Section 7, Making or supplying articles for use in frauds
(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he makes, adapts, supplies or offers to supply any article –
(a) knowing that it is designed or adapted for use in the course of or in connection with fraud, or
(b) intending it to be used to commit, or assist in the commission of, fraud.
(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);
(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or to both).
Awakened-GB 
Birmingham Mags Court is issuing the warrants in secrecy and refusing observers into the bulk hearings. The energy companies are not submitting witness statements to support the applications and the court is NOT informing any occupier that they’re named parties in the hearings. Obviously, any occupier is unaware of the hearing and thus cannot defend themselves against the fraud. This is the main problem and the court is refusing to comply with due process.
LikeLike
Great work. I notice that the most recent changes in the Electricity Act 1989 -Schedule 6 mentions a “Deemed Contract” for electricity is you take a supply from any energy companies. This is in direct conflict with the requirements of Companies Act 2006 -Section 44 which requires Director/CEO/ Designated secretary and the consumer to sign in wet ink signatures on a contract to make it legally binding. Is this correct ?
LikeLike
The Electricity act 1989, Schedule 6 mentions ‘supplier’ 9 times. For example:
3(1)Where an electricity supplier supplies electricity to any premises otherwise than in pursuance of a contract, the supplier shall be deemed to have contracted with the occupier (or the owner if the premises are unoccupied) for the supply of electricity as from the time (“the relevant time”) when he began so to supply electricity.
The word Supplier is key to this; go onto Companies House and search for the company and look at the bottom of their profile page for their SIC Code. This is what they are registered as. If the company isn’t registered as a supplier then they have no rights under the Electricity Act or any other act that gives rights to suppliers.
In this post it was shown that Octopus is registered as a ‘Trader’ and the post said that they have no rights under the Electricity Act 1989.
LikeLiked by 1 person